- We have a mailbag now!
- Standings Entering Week 15
- Clinching Scenarios Entering Week 15
- Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 15
- Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 15
- Seed Control Entering Week 15
- Contact Us
We have a mailbag now!
Send a message here and we will have a Wednesday or Thursday post addressing a selection of them!
Due to the complexity of this week’s scenarios, odds are that this week’s mailbag will be released on Thursday.
Standings Entering Week 15
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
1 |
|
10-3 | 8-1 | DAL wins the tiebreak over PHI on Division Record (4-1 vs 3-1). SF wins the tiebreak over DAL on Head-to-Head. |
2 |
|
10-3 | 7-3 | DAL wins the tiebreak over PHI on Division Record (4-1 vs 3-1). |
3 |
|
9-4 | 6-3 | |
4 |
|
6-7 | 5-4 | NO drops out of the tiebreak with ATL/TB on Head-to-Head (0-2 vs 2-1). TB wins the tiebreak over ATL on Common Games (4-2 vs 3-3). |
5 |
|
10-3 | 6-2 | |
6 |
|
7-6 | 6-3 | |
7 |
|
6-7 | 4-4 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (2-0). ATL wins the tiebreak over NO on Head-to-Head (1-0). ATL drops out of the tiebreak with GB/LAR on Conference Record (4-5 vs 4-4). GB wins the tiebreak over LAR on Head-to-Head. |
8 |
|
6-7 | 4-4 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (2-0). ATL wins the tiebreak over NO on Head-to-Head (1-0). LAR wins the tiebreak over ATL on Conference Record (4-4 vs 4-5). |
9 |
|
6-7 | 5-5 | ATL wins the tiebreak over NO on Head-to-Head (1-0). SEA wins the tiebreak over ATL on Conference Record (5-5 vs 4-5). |
10 |
|
6-7 | 4-5 | ATL wins the tiebreak over NO on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
11 |
|
6-7 | 3-5 | |
12 |
|
5-8 | 4-4 | NYG wins the tiebreak over CHI on Conference Record (4-4 vs 4-5). |
13 |
|
5-8 | 4-5 | |
14 |
|
4-9 | 2-7 | |
15 |
|
3-10 | 2-6 | |
16 |
|
1-12 | 0-9 | |
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
1 |
|
10-3 | 6-3 | |
2 |
|
9-4 | 6-3 | |
3 |
|
8-5 | 6-2 | KC wins the tiebreak over JAX on Head-to-Head. |
4 |
|
8-5 | 6-4 | |
5 |
|
8-5 | 6-3 | |
6 |
|
7-6 | 5-4 | PIT wins the tiebreak over CIN on Head-to-Head (1-0). IND wins the tiebreak over HOU on Head-to-Head (1-0). BUF/DEN drops out of the tiebreak with PIT/IND on Conference Record (4-5/4-5 vs 5-4). PIT wins the tiebreak over IND on Common Games (5-4 vs 5-5). |
7 |
|
7-6 | 5-4 | IND wins the tiebreak over HOU on Head-to-Head (1-0). IND wins the tiebreak over BUF/DEN/CIN on Conference Record (5-4 vs 4-5/4-5/3-6). |
8 |
|
7-6 | 4-4 | HOU wins the tiebreak over BUF/DEN/CIN on Conference Record (4-4 vs 4-5/4-5/3-6). |
9 |
|
7-6 | 4-5 | BUF drops out of the tiebreak with CIN/DEN on Head-to-Head Sweep. DEN wins the tiebreak over CIN on Conference Record (4-5 vs 3-6). |
10 |
|
7-6 | 3-6 | CIN wins the tiebreak over BUF on Head-to-Head. |
11 |
|
7-6 | 4-5 | |
12 |
|
5-8 | 3-5 | LAC wins the tiebreak over LV on Head-to-Head (1-0). LAC wins the tiebreak over NYJ/TEN on Conference Record (3-5 vs 3-6/3-6). |
13 |
|
5-8 | 3-5 | LV wins the tiebreak over NYJ/TEN on Conference Record (3-5 vs 3-6/3-6). |
14 |
|
5-8 | 3-6 | NYJ wins the tiebreak over TEN on Strength of Victory (36-29 vs 28-37). |
15 |
|
5-8 | 3-6 | |
16 |
|
3-10 | 3-5 |
NFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
10-3 | 4-1 | DAL wins the tiebreak over PHI on Division Record (4-1 vs 3-1). |
2 |
|
10-3 | 3-1 | |
3 |
|
5-8 | 2-2 | |
4 |
|
4-9 | 0-5 | |
NFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
9-4 | 2-2 | |
2 |
|
7-6 | 2-1 | |
3 |
|
6-7 | 2-2 | |
4 |
|
5-8 | 2-3 | |
NFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
6-7 | 3-1 | NO drops out of the tiebreak with ATL/TB on Head-to-Head (0-2 vs 2-1). TB wins the tiebreak over ATL on Common Games (4-2 vs 3-3). |
2 |
|
6-7 | 3-1 | ATL wins the tiebreak over NO on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
3 |
|
6-7 | 2-2 | |
4 |
|
1-12 | 0-4 | |
NFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
10-3 | 4-0 | |
2 |
|
6-7 | 4-1 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (2-0). |
3 |
|
6-7 | 1-4 | |
4 |
|
3-10 | 0-4 | |
AFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
9-4 | 3-1 | |
2 |
|
7-6 | 2-2 | |
3 |
|
5-8 | 1-3 | |
4 |
|
3-10 | 2-2 | |
AFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
10-3 | 3-2 | |
2 |
|
8-5 | 3-2 | |
3 |
|
7-6 | 3-1 | PIT wins the tiebreak over CIN on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
4 |
|
7-6 | 0-4 | |
AFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
8-5 | 4-1 | |
2 |
|
7-6 | 3-2 | IND wins the tiebreak over HOU on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
3 |
|
7-6 | 1-2 | |
4 |
|
5-8 | 0-3 | |
AFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
8-5 | 3-1 | |
2 |
|
7-6 | 2-2 | |
3 |
|
5-8 | 1-2 | LAC wins the tiebreak over LV on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
4 |
|
5-8 | 1-2 |
x Team has clinched a playoff berth.
e Team has been eliminated from playoff contention.
k Team has been knocked out of division title contention.
Clinching Scenarios Entering Week 15
NFC
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
OR | 17) |
|
OR | 18) |
|
OR | 19) |
|
The results in italics are for DAL clinching a tie in Strength of Victory vs ATL
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
AFC
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
OR | 17) |
|
OR | 18) |
|
OR | 19) |
|
OR | 20) |
|
OR | 21) |
|
OR | 22) |
|
OR | 23) |
|
OR | 24) |
|
OR | 25) |
|
Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 15
LAC & LV elimination scenarios are proving to be exceedingly challenging. It is possible that they will not be complete this week. Neither team can be eliminated prior to Sunday, but Thursday & Saturday’s games will have a substantial impact. If all else fails, the elimination scenarios will be calculated on Saturday for the needed team if an elimination scenario still exists for them. Note that neither can be eliminated with a win/tie, and they play each other on Thursday.
NFC
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
OR | 17) |
|
OR | 18) |
|
OR | 19) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
OR | 17) |
|
OR | 18) |
|
OR | 19) |
|
OR | 20) |
|
OR | 21) |
|
OR | 22) |
|
The portions in italics are for LAR either clinching Strength of Victory over TB or clinching a tie in Strength of Victory and clinching Strength of Schedule
AFC
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
LV cannot be eliminated with a win/tie, and cannot be eliminated prior to Sunday. If an elimination scenario still exists for them after Saturday’s games, a complete elimination scenario for the remaining games will be calculated and put in the live post before Sunday’s games kick off.
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
LAC cannot be eliminated with a win/tie, and cannot be eliminated prior to Sunday. If an elimination scenario still exists for them after Saturday’s games, a complete elimination scenario for the remaining games will be calculated and put in the live post before Sunday’s games kick off.
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 15
We’re trying something new this year. Now that we have some teams knocked out of some seedlines, rather than just list the possible seeds, we’re going to approximate the percentage of possible outcomes than result in each seed’s outcomes. Note that this is not a prediction. This is an estimate of the percentage of possible results that yield each seed. Since we only care about possibilities, we approximate this by running 1 million simulations with all 3 results being equally likely - home win, away win, and tie. If an entry is blank, that means the seed is not possible for that team. Also note that due to rounding, the numbers for a team may not add up to exactly 100%
NFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home win/away win/tie all equally likely
1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
40% | 47% | 13% | <1% | <1% | <1% | ||
|
29% | 21% | 6% | <1% | 44% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
|
5% | 16% | 67% | <1% | <1% | 10% | 1% | <1% |
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | 37% | 2% | 7% | 54% | |
|
26% | 16% | 3% | 55% | <1% | <1% | <1% | |
|
<1% | 1% | 11% | <1% | <1% | 51% | 18% | 19% |
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 15% | 18% | 67% |
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 9% | 20% | 71% |
|
<1% | 8% | 18% | 74% | ||||
|
<1% | 34% | <1% | 1% | 5% | 60% | ||
|
<1% | 29% | 1% | 5% | 65% | |||
|
1% | 6% | 93% | |||||
|
1% | 3% | 96% | |||||
|
<1% | <1% | >99% | |||||
|
<1% | <1% | >99% | |||||
|
100% |
AFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home win/away win/tie all equally likely
1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68% | 19% | 5% | 1% | 6% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
|
23% | 39% | 20% | 9% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 2% |
|
3% | 19% | 31% | 29% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 9% |
|
4% | 14% | 26% | 32% | 2% | 5% | 6% | 11% |
|
3% | 2% | 1% | <1% | 49% | 19% | 11% | 16% |
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 12% | 17% | 15% | 56% |
|
<1% | 2% | 4% | 7% | 4% | 12% | 14% | 58% |
|
<1% | 1% | 4% | 6% | 7% | 11% | 13% | 58% |
|
<1% | 1% | 5% | 11% | 4% | 8% | 11% | 60% |
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 10% | 14% | 13% | 63% |
|
<1% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 8% | 11% | 69% |
|
<1% | <1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 99% | |
|
<1% | <1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 99% | |
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | >99% | ||||
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% | |
|
100% |
Seed Control Entering Week 15
The seed that a team controls is the worst seed that team could get if they win out. These are often mutually exclusive because it is impossible for teams that play each other in future weeks to both win out. If a team changed controlled seed from last week, last week’s seed is noted in parentheses.
Teams that control the 1 seed:
SF(2)
MIA
BAL
Teams that control the 2 seed:
PHI(1)
Teams that control the 3 seed:
DET
MIN(6)
KC
Teams that control the 4 seed:
TB
NO(E)
JAX(3)
Teams that control the 5 seed:
DAL
CLE(6)
Teams that control the 6 seed:
None
Teams that control the 7 seed:
GB
PIT(6)
IND(6)
Teams that could win out and still miss the playoffs:
NYG
WAS
CHI
ATL(4)
CAR
LAR(7)
SEA
ARI
BUF
NYJ
NE
CIN
HOU(6)
TEN
DEN
LAC
LV
Contact Us
Mailbag | Twitter | BlueSky | reddit