- We have a mailbag now!
- Standings Entering Week 16
- Clinching Scenarios Entering Week 16
- Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 16
- Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 16
- Seed Control Entering Week 16
- Contact Us
We have a mailbag now!
Send a message here and we will have a Wednesday or Thursday post addressing a selection of them!
In this week’s mailbag, we cover the DAL & PHI Strength of Victory situation for the division title. We also break down some of the logic behind the CLE clinching scenarios, and more!
Standings Entering Week 16
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
1 |
|
11-3 | 9-1 | |
2 |
|
10-4 | 7-3 | DAL wins the tiebreak over PHI on Division Record (4-1 vs 3-1). DAL wins the tiebreak over DET on Conference Record (7-3 vs 6-3). |
3 |
|
10-4 | 6-3 | |
4 |
|
7-7 | 6-4 | TB wins the tiebreak over NO on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
5 |
|
10-4 | 6-3 | |
6 |
|
7-7 | 6-3 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (2-0). MIN wins the tiebreak over LAR/NO on Conference Record (6-3 vs 5-4/4-5). |
7 |
|
7-7 | 5-4 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (2-0). LAR wins the tiebreak over NO on Conference Record (5-4 vs 4-5). |
8 |
|
7-7 | 6-5 | SEA wins the tiebreak over NO on Conference Record (6-5 vs 4-5). |
9 |
|
7-7 | 4-5 | |
10 |
|
6-8 | 4-6 | ATL wins the tiebreak over GB on Head-to-Head. |
11 |
|
6-8 | 4-5 | |
12 |
|
5-9 | 4-5 | NYG wins the tiebreak over CHI on Common Games (3-2 vs 2-2). |
13 |
|
5-9 | 4-5 | |
14 |
|
4-10 | 2-8 | |
15 |
|
3-11 | 2-7 | |
16 |
|
2-12 | 1-9 | |
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
1 |
|
11-3 | 7-3 | |
2 |
|
10-4 | 7-3 | |
3 |
|
9-5 | 7-2 | |
4 |
|
8-6 | 6-5 | JAX wins the tiebreak over HOU/IND on Head-to-Head (3-1 vs 1-2/1-2). |
5 |
|
9-5 | 6-3 | |
6 |
|
8-6 | 3-6 | IND wins the tiebreak over HOU on Head-to-Head (1-0). CIN wins the tiebreak over BUF/IND on Head-to-Head Sweep. |
7 |
|
8-6 | 6-4 | IND wins the tiebreak over HOU on Head-to-Head (1-0). IND wins the tiebreak over BUF on Conference Record (6-4 vs 4-5). |
8 |
|
8-6 | 5-4 | HOU wins the tiebreak over BUF on Conference Record (5-4 vs 4-5). |
9 |
|
8-6 | 4-5 | |
10 |
|
7-7 | 5-5 | PIT wins the tiebreak over DEN on Conference Record (5-5 vs 4-5). |
11 |
|
7-7 | 4-5 | |
12 |
|
6-8 | 4-5 | |
13 |
|
5-9 | 3-6 | LAC wins the tiebreak over NYJ/TEN on Conference Record (3-6 vs 3-7/3-7). |
14 |
|
5-9 | 3-7 | TEN wins the tiebreak over NYJ on Common Games (3-1 vs 1-4). |
15 |
|
5-9 | 3-7 | |
16 |
|
3-11 | 3-6 |
NFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
10-4 | 4-1 | DAL wins the tiebreak over PHI on Division Record (4-1 vs 3-1). |
2 |
|
10-4 | 3-1 | |
3 |
|
5-9 | 2-2 | |
4 |
|
4-10 | 0-5 | |
NFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
10-4 | 2-2 | |
2 |
|
7-7 | 2-1 | |
3 |
|
6-8 | 2-2 | |
4 |
|
5-9 | 2-3 | |
NFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
7-7 | 3-1 | TB wins the tiebreak over NO on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
2 |
|
7-7 | 2-2 | |
3 |
|
6-8 | 3-2 | |
4 |
|
2-12 | 1-4 | |
NFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
11-3 | 5-0 | |
2 |
|
7-7 | 4-1 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (2-0). |
3 |
|
7-7 | 1-4 | |
4 |
|
3-11 | 0-5 | |
AFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
10-4 | 4-1 | |
2 |
|
8-6 | 2-2 | |
3 |
|
5-9 | 1-4 | |
4 |
|
3-11 | 2-2 | |
AFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
11-3 | 3-2 | |
2 |
|
9-5 | 3-2 | |
3 |
|
8-6 | 0-4 | |
4 |
|
7-7 | 3-1 | |
AFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
8-6 | 4-1 | JAX wins the tiebreak over HOU/IND on Head-to-Head (3-1 vs 1-2/1-2). |
2 |
|
8-6 | 3-2 | IND wins the tiebreak over HOU on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
3 |
|
8-6 | 2-2 | |
4 |
|
5-9 | 0-4 | |
AFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
1 |
|
9-5 | 3-1 | |
2 |
|
7-7 | 2-2 | |
3 |
|
6-8 | 2-2 | |
4 |
|
5-9 | 1-3 |
x Team has clinched a playoff berth.
y Team has clinched their division title.
e Team has been eliminated from playoff contention.
k Team has been knocked out of division title contention.
Clinching Scenarios Entering Week 16
NFC
|
1) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
AFC
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 16
NFC
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
OR | 17) |
|
OR | 18) |
|
OR | 19) |
|
OR | 20) |
|
OR | 21) |
|
OR | 22) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
OR | 17) |
|
OR | 18) |
|
OR | 19) |
|
OR | 20) |
|
OR | 21) |
|
OR | 22) |
|
OR | 23) |
|
OR | 24) |
|
OR | 25) |
|
OR | 26) |
|
OR | 27) |
|
OR | 28) |
|
OR | 29) |
|
OR | 30) |
|
OR | 31) |
|
OR | 32) |
|
OR | 33) |
|
OR | 34) |
|
OR | 35) |
|
OR | 36) |
|
OR | 37) |
|
OR | 38) |
|
OR | 39) |
|
OR | 40) |
|
OR | 41) |
|
OR | 42) |
|
OR | 43) |
|
OR | 44) |
|
OR | 45) |
|
OR | 46) |
|
OR | 47) |
|
OR | 48) |
|
OR | 49) |
|
OR | 50) |
|
OR | 51) |
|
The portions of the scenarios in italics is for TB and/or CHI clinching Strength of Victory over NYG
|
1) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
1) |
|
AFC
|
1) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
OR | 17) |
|
OR | 18) |
|
OR | 19) |
|
OR | 20) |
|
OR | 21) |
|
OR | 22) |
|
OR | 23) |
|
OR | 24) |
|
OR | 25) |
|
OR | 26) |
|
OR | 27) |
|
OR | 28) |
|
OR | 29) |
|
OR | 30) |
|
OR | 31) |
|
OR | 32) |
|
OR | 33) |
|
OR | 34) |
|
OR | 35) |
|
OR | 36) |
|
OR | 37) |
|
OR | 38) |
|
OR | 39) |
|
OR | 40) |
|
OR | 41) |
|
OR | 42) |
|
OR | 43) |
|
OR | 44) |
|
OR | 45) |
|
OR | 46) |
|
OR | 47) |
|
OR | 48) |
|
OR | 49) |
|
OR | 50) |
|
OR | 51) |
|
OR | 52) |
|
OR | 53) |
|
OR | 54) |
|
OR | 55) |
|
OR | 56) |
|
OR | 57) |
|
OR | 58) |
|
OR | 59) |
|
OR | 60) |
|
OR | 61) |
|
OR | 62) |
|
OR | 63) |
|
OR | 64) |
|
OR | 65) |
|
OR | 66) |
|
OR | 67) |
|
OR | 68) |
|
OR | 69) |
|
OR | 70) |
|
OR | 71) |
|
OR | 72) |
|
OR | 73) |
|
OR | 74) |
|
OR | 75) |
|
OR | 76) |
|
OR | 77) |
|
OR | 78) |
|
OR | 79) |
|
OR | 80) |
|
OR | 81) |
|
OR | 82) |
|
OR | 83) |
|
OR | 84) |
|
The portions of scenarios in italics are for PIT and/or JAX clinching Strength of Victory over LAC
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
The portions in italics are for BAL clinching a tie in Strength of Victory over BUF
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
OR | 5) |
|
OR | 6) |
|
OR | 7) |
|
OR | 8) |
|
OR | 9) |
|
OR | 10) |
|
OR | 11) |
|
OR | 12) |
|
OR | 13) |
|
OR | 14) |
|
OR | 15) |
|
OR | 16) |
|
OR | 17) |
|
OR | 18) |
|
OR | 19) |
|
OR | 20) |
|
OR | 21) |
|
OR | 22) |
|
OR | 23) |
|
OR | 24) |
|
OR | 25) |
|
OR | 26) |
|
OR | 27) |
|
OR | 28) |
|
OR | 29) |
|
OR | 30) |
|
OR | 31) |
|
OR | 32) |
|
OR | 33) |
|
OR | 34) |
|
OR | 35) |
|
OR | 36) |
|
OR | 37) |
|
OR | 38) |
|
OR | 39) |
|
OR | 40) |
|
OR | 41) |
|
OR | 42) |
|
OR | 43) |
|
OR | 44) |
|
OR | 45) |
|
OR | 46) |
|
OR | 47) |
|
OR | 48) |
|
OR | 49) |
|
OR | 50) |
|
OR | 51) |
|
OR | 52) |
|
OR | 53) |
|
OR | 54) |
|
OR | 55) |
|
OR | 56) |
|
OR | 57) |
|
OR | 58) |
|
OR | 59) |
|
OR | 60) |
|
OR | 61) |
|
OR | 62) |
|
OR | 63) |
|
OR | 64) |
|
OR | 65) |
|
OR | 66) |
|
OR | 67) |
|
OR | 68) |
|
OR | 69) |
|
OR | 70) |
|
OR | 71) |
|
OR | 72) |
|
OR | 73) |
|
OR | 74) |
|
OR | 75) |
|
OR | 76) |
|
OR | 77) |
|
OR | 78) |
|
OR | 79) |
|
OR | 80) |
|
OR | 81) |
|
OR | 82) |
|
OR | 83) |
|
OR | 84) |
|
OR | 85) |
|
OR | 86) |
|
OR | 87) |
|
OR | 88) |
|
OR | 89) |
|
OR | 90) |
|
OR | 91) |
|
OR | 92) |
|
OR | 93) |
|
OR | 94) |
|
OR | 95) |
|
OR | 96) |
|
OR | 97) |
|
OR | 98) |
|
OR | 99) |
|
OR | 100) |
|
OR | 101) |
|
OR | 102) |
|
OR | 103) |
|
OR | 104) |
|
OR | 105) |
|
OR | 106) |
|
OR | 107) |
|
OR | 108) |
|
OR | 109) |
|
OR | 110) |
|
OR | 111) |
|
OR | 112) |
|
OR | 113) |
|
OR | 114) |
|
OR | 115) |
|
OR | 116) |
|
OR | 117) |
|
OR | 118) |
|
OR | 119) |
|
OR | 120) |
|
OR | 121) |
|
OR | 122) |
|
OR | 123) |
|
OR | 124) |
|
OR | 125) |
|
OR | 126) | CIN win + ATL win/tie + SEA win + LAR win |
OR | 127) | CIN win + ATL win/tie + 1.5 combined wins from (SEA, LAR) + 1 or more combined wins from (DET, GB, ARI) |
OR | 128) | CIN win + ATL win/tie + 1 combined wins from (SEA, LAR) + 2 or more combined wins from (DET, GB, ARI) |
OR | 129) | CIN win + ATL win/tie + 0.5 combined wins from (SEA, LAR) + DET win + GB win + ARI win |
OR | 130) | CIN win + SEA win + LAR win + 0.5 or more combined wins from (DET, GB, ARI) |
OR | 131) | CIN win + 1.5 combined wins from (SEA, LAR) + 1.5 or more combined wins from (DET, GB, ARI) |
OR | 132) | CIN win + 1 combined wins from (SEA, LAR) + 2.5 or more combined wins from (DET, GB, ARI) |
OR | 133) | CIN tie + SEA win + LAR win + 2 or more combined wins from (DET, GB, ATL, ARI) |
OR | 134) | CIN tie + 1.5 combined wins from (SEA, LAR) + 3 or more combined wins from (DET, GB, ATL, ARI) |
OR | 135) | CIN tie + 1 combined wins from (SEA, LAR) + DET win + GB win + ATL win + ARI win |
OR | 136) | SEA win + LAR win + 3.5 or more combined wins from (DET, GB, ATL, ARI) |
The portion of scenarios in italics are for BAL clinching appropriate ties or wins in Strength of Victory & Strength of Schedule over JAX
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
|
1) |
|
|
OR | 2) |
|
OR | 3) |
|
OR | 4) |
|
Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 16
We’re trying something new this year. Now that we have some teams knocked out of some seedlines, rather than just list the possible seeds, we’re going to approximate the percentage of possible outcomes than result in each seed’s outcomes. Note that this is not a prediction. This is an estimate of the percentage of possible results that yield each seed. Since we only care about possibilities, we approximate this by running 1 million simulations with all 3 results being equally likely - home win, away win, and tie. If an entry is blank, that means the seed is not possible for that team. Also note that due to rounding, the numbers for a team may not add up to exactly 100%
NFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home win/away win/tie all equally likely
1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76% | 19% | 5% | |||||
|
8% | 31% | 19% | <1% | 42% | <1% | ||
|
8% | 27% | 63% | 1% | <1% | <1% | ||
|
<1% | 53% | 4% | 8% | 34% | |||
|
7% | 23% | 12% | 57% | <1% | <1% | ||
|
1% | <1% | <1% | 37% | 23% | 39% | ||
|
<1% | 27% | 25% | 48% | ||||
|
<1% | 22% | 25% | 52% | ||||
|
<1% | 39% | 4% | 8% | 50% | |||
|
8% | 1% | 3% | 89% | ||||
|
4% | 7% | 89% | |||||
|
<1% | <1% | 99% | |||||
|
<1% | <1% | >99% | |||||
|
100% | |||||||
|
100% | |||||||
|
100% |
AFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home win/away win/tie all equally likely
1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73% | 21% | 2% | <1% | 4% | <1% | <1% | |
|
24% | 50% | 17% | 2% | 3% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
|
2% | 21% | 53% | 21% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 2% |
|
<1% | 1% | 9% | 31% | 1% | 8% | 14% | 36% |
|
1% | 2% | <1% | <1% | 70% | 14% | 6% | 6% |
|
12% | 27% | 18% | 43% | ||||
|
<1% | 1% | 8% | 22% | 2% | 10% | 15% | 42% |
|
<1% | 1% | 7% | 19% | 4% | 12% | 14% | 43% |
|
<1% | 3% | 2% | 1% | 4% | 17% | 18% | 55% |
|
1% | 4% | 7% | 88% | ||||
|
<1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 3% | 6% | 87% | |
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 99% | ||
|
<1% | <1% | >99% | |||||
|
100% | |||||||
|
100% | |||||||
|
100% |
Seed Control Entering Week 16
The seed that a team controls is the worst seed that team could get if they win out. These are often mutually exclusive because it is impossible for teams that play each other in future weeks to both win out. If a team changed controlled seed from last week, last week’s seed is noted in parentheses.
Teams that control the 1 seed:
SF
MIA
BAL
Teams that control the 2 seed:
DET(3)
Teams that control the 3 seed:
KC
Teams that control the 4 seed:
TB
NO
JAX
Teams that control the 5 seed:
DAL
PHI(2)
CLE
Teams that control the 6 seed:
MIN(3)
Teams that control the 7 seed:
LAR(E)
IND
HOU(E)
Teams that could win out and still miss the playoffs:
NYG
WAS
GB(7)
CHI
ATL
CAR
SEA
ARI
BUF
NYJ
NE
CIN
PIT(7)
TEN
DEN
LAC
LV
Contact Us
Mailbag | Twitter | BlueSky | reddit