- Standings Entering Week 11
- Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 11
- Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 11
- Seed Control Entering Week 11
- Please consider supporting us!
- Contact Us
Standings Entering Week 11
|
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
| 1 |
|
7-2 | 6-1 | SEA wins the tiebreak over LAR on Division Record (2-1 vs 1-1). PHI wins the tiebreak over SEA on Conference Record (6-1 vs 4-2). |
| 2 |
|
7-2 | 4-2 | SEA wins the tiebreak over LAR on Division Record (2-1 vs 1-1). |
| 3 |
|
6-3 | 3-2 | DET wins the tiebreak over CHI on Head-to-Head (1-0). DET wins the tiebreak over TB on Head-to-Head. |
| 4 |
|
6-3 | 4-2 | |
| 5 |
|
7-2 | 2-2 | |
| 6 |
|
6-3 | 4-2 | |
| 7 |
|
5-3-1 | 3-2-1 | |
| 8 |
|
6-4 | 6-2 | |
| 9 |
|
5-5 | 3-2 | |
| 10 |
|
4-5 | 2-2 | |
| 11 |
|
3-5-1 | 2-4-1 | |
| 12 |
|
3-6 | 3-4 | ARI wins the tiebreak over ATL on Conference Record (3-4 vs 2-3). |
| 13 |
|
3-6 | 2-3 | |
| 14 |
|
3-7 | 1-6 | |
| 15 |
|
2-8 | 2-6 | NO wins the tiebreak over NYG on Head-to-Head. |
| 16 |
|
2-8 | 1-6 | |
|
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
| 1 |
|
8-2 | 6-1 | IND wins the tiebreak over DEN/NE on Conference Record (6-1 vs 5-2/4-2). |
| 2 |
|
8-2 | 5-2 | DEN wins the tiebreak over NE on Conference Record (5-2 vs 4-2). |
| 3 |
|
8-2 | 4-2 | |
| 4 |
|
5-4 | 4-2 | |
| 5 |
|
7-3 | 6-1 | |
| 6 |
|
6-3 | 4-2 | |
| 7 |
|
5-4 | 3-2 | JAX wins the tiebreak over KC on Head-to-Head. |
| 8 |
|
5-4 | 2-3 | |
| 9 |
|
4-5 | 3-2 | HOU wins the tiebreak over BAL on Head-to-Head. |
| 10 |
|
4-5 | 2-3 | |
| 11 |
|
3-6 | 3-2 | |
| 12 |
|
3-7 | 2-6 | |
| 13 |
|
2-7 | 2-4 | NYJ wins the tiebreak over LV/CLE on Conference Record (2-4 vs 2-5/1-5). |
| 14 |
|
2-7 | 2-5 | LV wins the tiebreak over CLE on Conference Record (2-5 vs 1-5). |
| 15 |
|
2-7 | 1-5 | |
| 16 |
|
1-8 | 0-7 |
| NFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
7-2 | 2-1 | |
| 2 |
|
3-5-1 | 2-1 | |
| 3 |
|
3-7 | 1-1 | |
| 4 |
|
2-8 | 1-3 | |
| NFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
6-3 | 1-2 | DET wins the tiebreak over CHI on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
| 2 |
|
6-3 | 0-2 | |
| 3 |
|
5-3-1 | 1-0 | |
| 4 |
|
4-5 | 2-0 | |
| NFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
6-3 | 2-0 | |
| 2 |
|
5-5 | 1-1 | |
| 3 |
|
3-6 | 0-2 | |
| 4 |
|
2-8 | 1-1 | |
| NFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
7-2 | 2-1 | SEA wins the tiebreak over LAR on Division Record (2-1 vs 1-1). |
| 2 |
|
7-2 | 1-1 | |
| 3 |
|
6-4 | 3-1 | |
| 4 |
|
3-6 | 0-3 | |
| AFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
8-2 | 2-0 | |
| 2 |
|
6-3 | 2-2 | |
| 3 |
|
3-7 | 2-2 | |
| 4 |
|
2-7 | 0-2 | |
| AFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
5-4 | 1-1 | |
| 2 |
|
4-5 | 1-0 | |
| 3 |
|
3-6 | 2-0 | |
| 4 |
|
2-7 | 0-3 | |
| AFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
8-2 | 2-0 | |
| 2 |
|
5-4 | 1-1 | |
| 3 |
|
4-5 | 2-1 | |
| 4 |
|
1-8 | 0-3 | |
| AFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
8-2 | 1-1 | |
| 2 |
|
7-3 | 3-0 | |
| 3 |
|
5-4 | 1-1 | |
| 4 |
|
2-7 | 0-3 |
Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 11
NFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
| OR | 8) |
|
| OR | 9) |
|
| OR | 10) |
|
| OR | 11) |
|
| OR | 12) |
|
| OR | 13) |
|
| OR | 14) |
|
| OR | 15) |
|
| OR | 16) |
|
| OR | 17) |
|
AFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 11
We often say we’re in the business of possibilities, not probabilities. Because of that, in the past, the tables below have been equal chance for win, loss, and tie. For a number of reasons (including many requests from visitors), we are changing the simulation to be 49.5% home win, 49.5% away win, 1% tie. This means that the table no longer shows a perfect percentage of possible outcomes, but it shows a more likely distribution of the possible outcomes.
The table below is from 1 millions simulations using the above 49.5/49.5/1 criteria. To reiterate, this is not a prediction.
If an entry is blank, the team cannot get that seed. It’s also worth noting that due to rounding, the numbers for a team may not add up to exactly 100%
NFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home and away teams both 49.5% to win each game and 1% chance of a tie game
| 1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27% | 23% | 25% | 17% | <1% | 1% | 1% | 5% |
|
|
19% | 14% | 8% | 4% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 13% |
|
|
9% | 12% | 10% | 5% | 9% | 12% | 12% | 31% |
|
|
7% | 11% | 18% | 36% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 21% |
|
|
20% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 21% | 13% | 8% | 14% |
|
|
9% | 11% | 9% | 4% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 32% |
|
|
4% | 8% | 9% | 5% | 8% | 12% | 14% | 41% |
|
|
4% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 18% | 18% | 15% | 36% |
|
|
1% | 3% | 6% | 14% | 3% | 5% | 8% | 61% |
|
|
<1% | 1% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 5% | 8% | 77% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | 1% | 3% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 88% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 94% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 1% | 3% | 92% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | 2% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 97% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
AFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home and away teams both 49.5% to win each game and 1% chance of a tie game
| 1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
33% | 24% | 18% | 5% | 6% | 5% | 4% | 4% |
|
|
24% | 20% | 11% | 2% | 21% | 11% | 6% | 5% |
|
|
20% | 24% | 26% | 8% | 6% | 7% | 5% | 5% |
|
|
2% | 4% | 10% | 37% | 1% | 3% | 5% | 39% |
|
|
11% | 12% | 10% | 1% | 26% | 16% | 11% | 12% |
|
|
5% | 7% | 8% | 2% | 19% | 21% | 14% | 24% |
|
|
2% | 4% | 6% | 2% | 9% | 13% | 16% | 48% |
|
|
2% | 3% | 3% | 1% | 8% | 13% | 16% | 54% |
|
|
<1% | 1% | 3% | 1% | 4% | 8% | 12% | 71% |
|
|
<1% | 1% | 3% | 28% | <1% | 1% | 2% | 65% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | 1% | 12% | <1% | 1% | 3% | 82% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 2% | 98% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 2% | 97% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 98% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | 2% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 97% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
Seed Control Entering Week 11
The seed that a team controls is the worst seed that team could get if they win out. These are often mutually exclusive because it is impossible for teams that play each other in future weeks to both win out. If a team changed controlled seed from last week, last week’s seed is noted in parentheses.
Teams that control the 1 seed:
PHI
IND(2)
Teams that control the 2 seed:
SEA(3)
LAR
DEN(3)
Teams that control the 3 seed:
NE
JAX
LAC
Teams that control the 4 seed:
DET
CHI
GB(3)
TB(2)
CAR
PIT
BAL
KC
Teams that control the 5 seed:
BUF(2)
Teams that control the 6 seed:
SF(3)
Teams that control the 7 seed:
MIN(4)
HOU
Teams that could win out and still miss the playoffs:
DAL
WAS
NYG
ATL
NO
ARI
MIA
NYJ
CIN
CLE
TEN
LV
Please consider supporting us!
We have a Patreon to allow you to donate to cover our costs, which in turn allows us to never put ads on the site again. Any donation is greatly appreciated, both by us and all visitors to the site! If you are unable to or do not wish to donate, that’s totally fine, too. You can help the site by sharing it on social media, and even if you don’t want to do that, just coming to the site helps us out, too!