- Standings Entering Week 12
- Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 12
- Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 12
- Seed Control Entering Week 12
- Please consider supporting us!
- Contact Us
NOTE: NO, WAS, ATL, and ARI (beyond division contention) can be knocked out of 1 seed contention this week. The scenarios have a lot of moving factors, making it difficult to and time-consuming to go through them comprehensively. To give you something readable to look at, we’ve added the simple tie-free pure-record 1 seed elimination scenarios for the teams in question. There are many subsets of these that will still eliminate, but this gives the readable high level view.
The live update post on Sunday will be monitoring these scenarios and we well let you know when one has been satisfied, even if it’s more restrictive than what shows here.
NOTE 2: After some analysis, none of NO, WAS, ATL, and ARI can be knocked out of 1 seed contention by the early window on Sunday, so we should be able to do some extra and quicker analysis for those games knowing the results of the early window games. Thursday night has no bearing.
Standings Entering Week 12
|
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
| 1 |
|
8-2 | 7-1 | PHI wins the tiebreak over LAR on Head-to-Head. |
| 2 |
|
8-2 | 3-2 | |
| 3 |
|
7-3 | 5-2 | |
| 4 |
|
6-4 | 4-2 | |
| 5 |
|
7-3 | 4-3 | |
| 6 |
|
6-3-1 | 4-2-1 | |
| 7 |
|
7-4 | 7-2 | |
| 8 |
|
6-4 | 3-3 | |
| 9 |
|
6-5 | 4-2 | |
| 10 |
|
4-5-1 | 2-4-1 | |
| 11 |
|
4-6 | 2-3 | |
| 12 |
|
3-7 | 3-5 | ARI wins the tiebreak over ATL on Conference Record (3-5 vs 2-4). |
| 13 |
|
3-7 | 2-4 | |
| 14 |
|
3-8 | 1-6 | |
| 15 |
|
2-8 | 2-6 | |
| 16 |
|
2-9 | 1-7 | |
|
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
| 1 |
|
9-2 | 6-2 | DEN wins the tiebreak over NE on Conference Record (6-2 vs 5-2). |
| 2 |
|
9-2 | 5-2 | |
| 3 |
|
8-2 | 6-1 | |
| 4 |
|
6-4 | 5-2 | |
| 5 |
|
7-3 | 4-2 | |
| 6 |
|
7-4 | 6-2 | |
| 7 |
|
6-4 | 4-2 | |
| 8 |
|
5-5 | 4-2 | BAL drops out of the tiebreak with HOU/KC on Head-to-Head Sweep. HOU wins the tiebreak over KC on Conference Record (4-2 vs 2-4). |
| 9 |
|
5-5 | 2-4 | KC wins the tiebreak over BAL on Head-to-Head. |
| 10 |
|
5-5 | 3-3 | |
| 11 |
|
4-7 | 2-6 | |
| 12 |
|
3-7 | 3-3 | |
| 13 |
|
2-8 | 2-5 | CLE drops out of the tiebreak with NYJ/LV on Conference Record (1-6 vs 2-5). LV wins the tiebreak over NYJ on Strength of Victory (10-11 vs 5-15). |
| 14 |
|
2-8 | 2-5 | NYJ wins the tiebreak over CLE on Head-to-Head. |
| 15 |
|
2-8 | 1-6 | |
| 16 |
|
1-9 | 0-8 |
| NFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
8-2 | 2-1 | |
| 2 |
|
4-5-1 | 2-1 | |
| 3 |
|
3-8 | 1-1 | |
| 4 |
|
2-9 | 1-3 | |
| NFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
7-3 | 1-2 | |
| 2 |
|
6-3-1 | 1-0 | |
| 3 |
|
6-4 | 1-2 | |
| 4 |
|
4-6 | 2-1 | |
| NFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
6-4 | 2-0 | |
| 2 |
|
6-5 | 2-1 | |
| 3 |
|
3-7 | 0-3 | |
| 4 |
|
2-8 | 1-1 | |
| NFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
8-2 | 2-1 | |
| 2 |
|
7-3 | 2-2 | |
| 3 |
|
7-4 | 4-1 | |
| 4 |
|
3-7 | 0-4 | |
| AFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
9-2 | 3-0 | |
| 2 |
|
7-3 | 2-2 | |
| 3 |
|
4-7 | 2-2 | |
| 4 |
|
2-8 | 0-3 | |
| AFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
6-4 | 2-1 | |
| 2 |
|
5-5 | 2-0 | |
| 3 |
|
3-7 | 2-1 | |
| 4 |
|
2-8 | 0-4 | |
| AFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
8-2 | 2-0 | |
| 2 |
|
6-4 | 1-1 | |
| 3 |
|
5-5 | 3-1 | |
| 4 |
|
1-9 | 0-4 | |
| AFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
9-2 | 2-1 | |
| 2 |
|
7-4 | 3-0 | |
| 3 |
|
5-5 | 1-2 | |
| 4 |
|
2-8 | 0-3 |
k Team has been knocked out of division title contention.
NFC Teams knocked out of 1 seed contention: NYG
AFC Teams knocked out of 1 seed contention: TEN
Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 12
NFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
NOTE: Due to complexities, time constraints, and readability, this is far from exhaustive. For readability at this point, most of the scenarios are no-tie, pure-record elimination. Variations may be added, but these are less restrictive than the full set. All of these will satisfy the scenario, but there are many subsets of these which will as well. However, they cannot be eliminated by the end of the early Sunday Window. The live update post on Sunday will be monitoring these scenarios and we well let you know when one has been satisfied, even if it’s more restrictive than what shows here.
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
| OR | 8) |
|
| OR | 9) |
|
NOTE: Due to complexities, time constraints, and readability, this is far from exhaustive. For readability at this point, most of the scenarios are no-tie, pure-record elimination. Variations may be added, but these are less restrictive than the full set. All of these will satisfy the scenario, but there are many subsets of these which will as well. However, they cannot be eliminated by the end of the early Sunday Window. The live update post on Sunday will be monitoring these scenarios and we well let you know when one has been satisfied, even if it’s more restrictive than what shows here.
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
| OR | 8) |
|
| OR | 9) |
|
| OR | 10) |
|
| OR | 11) |
|
NOTE: Due to complexities, time constraints, and readability, this is far from exhaustive. For readability at this point, most of the scenarios are no-tie, pure-record elimination. Variations may be added, but these are less restrictive than the full set. All of these will satisfy the scenario, but there are many subsets of these which will as well. However, they cannot be eliminated by the end of the early Sunday Window. The live update post on Sunday will be monitoring these scenarios and we well let you know when one has been satisfied, even if it’s more restrictive than what shows here.
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
| OR | 8) |
|
| OR | 9) |
|
| OR | 10) |
|
| OR | 11) |
|
| OR | 12) |
|
| OR | 13) |
|
| OR | 14) |
|
| OR | 15) |
|
| OR | 16) |
|
NOTE: Due to complexities, time constraints, and readability, this is far from exhaustive. For readability at this point, most of the scenarios are no-tie, pure-record elimination. Variations may be added, but these are less restrictive than the full set. All of these will satisfy the scenario, but there are many subsets of these which will as well. However, they cannot be eliminated by the end of the early Sunday Window. The live update post on Sunday will be monitoring these scenarios and we well let you know when one has been satisfied, even if it’s more restrictive than what shows here.
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
| OR | 8) |
|
| OR | 9) |
|
| OR | 10) |
|
| OR | 11) |
|
AFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 12
We often say we’re in the business of possibilities, not probabilities. Because of that, in our simulations, we consider each team equally likely to win. However, we do make the odds of a tie only 1% in order to increase variance and cover more of the possibility space in limited simulations.
The table below is from 1 millions simulations using 49.5% home win, 49.5% away win, and 1% tie odds. This is not a prediction. It is an estimate of the percentage of possible scenarios that results in this seed (under our 1% tie criteria).
If an entry is blank, the team cannot get that seed. It’s also worth noting that due to rounding, the numbers for a team may not add up to exactly 100%.
NFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home and away teams both 49.5% to win each game and 1% chance of a tie game
| 1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
38% | 26% | 23% | 9% | <1% | 1% | 1% | 2% |
|
|
25% | 19% | 10% | 4% | 18% | 10% | 6% | 7% |
|
|
13% | 14% | 12% | 5% | 12% | 12% | 11% | 21% |
|
|
3% | 6% | 12% | 40% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 32% |
|
|
8% | 8% | 5% | 2% | 22% | 18% | 13% | 22% |
|
|
5% | 10% | 13% | 5% | 9% | 14% | 15% | 29% |
|
|
5% | 6% | 4% | 2% | 24% | 20% | 15% | 24% |
|
|
3% | 6% | 9% | 3% | 8% | 12% | 14% | 46% |
|
|
1% | 4% | 8% | 25% | 3% | 5% | 8% | 47% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 4% | 7% | 84% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 3% | 5% | 89% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 99% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 98% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
AFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home and away teams both 49.5% to win each game and 1% chance of a tie game
| 1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
32% | 25% | 17% | 3% | 11% | 7% | 3% | 2% |
|
|
26% | 26% | 22% | 6% | 8% | 6% | 3% | 2% |
|
|
27% | 23% | 19% | 6% | 8% | 7% | 5% | 6% |
|
|
2% | 5% | 11% | 41% | 1% | 3% | 6% | 31% |
|
|
6% | 7% | 6% | 1% | 28% | 21% | 14% | 17% |
|
|
4% | 6% | 9% | 1% | 22% | 19% | 17% | 23% |
|
|
3% | 5% | 7% | 3% | 12% | 17% | 17% | 36% |
|
|
<1% | 1% | 4% | 1% | 6% | 10% | 14% | 62% |
|
|
<1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | 4% | 8% | 13% | 73% |
|
|
<1% | 1% | 3% | 32% | <1% | 1% | 3% | 59% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 2% | 97% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | 4% | <1% | 1% | 2% | 94% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | <1% | >99% |
Seed Control Entering Week 12
The seed that a team controls is the worst seed that team could get if they win out. These are often mutually exclusive because it is impossible for teams that play each other in future weeks to both win out. If a team changed controlled seed from last week, last week’s seed is noted in parentheses.
Teams that control the 1 seed:
PHI
IND
Teams that control the 2 seed:
CHI(4)
LAR
DEN
Teams that control the 3 seed:
GB(4)
NE
JAX
Teams that control the 4 seed:
DET
TB
CAR
PIT
BAL
Teams that control the 5 seed:
SEA(2)
SF(6)
BUF
Teams that control the 6 seed:
LAC(3)
Teams that control the 7 seed:
HOU
Teams that could win out and still miss the playoffs:
DAL
WAS
NYG
MIN(7)
ATL
NO
ARI
MIA
NYJ
CIN
CLE
TEN
KC(4)
LV
Please consider supporting us!
We have a Patreon to allow you to donate to cover our costs, which in turn allows us to never put ads on the site again. Any donation is greatly appreciated, both by us and all visitors to the site! If you are unable to or do not wish to donate, that’s totally fine, too. You can help the site by sharing it on social media, and even if you don’t want to do that, just coming to the site helps us out, too!