- Standings Entering Week 16
- Clinching Scenarios Entering Week 16
- Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 16
- Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 16
- Seed Control Entering Week 16
- Please consider supporting us!
- Contact Us
There is one missing GB 1 seed elimination scenario involving some complex Strength of Victory and Strength of Schedule analysis. Everything else is complete.
Standings Entering Week 16
|
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
| 1 |
|
11-3 | 6-3 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
| 2 |
|
10-4 | 6-3 | |
| 3 |
|
9-5 | 7-3 | |
| 4 |
|
7-7 | 5-5 | TB wins the tiebreak over CAR on Common Games (5-5 vs 4-6). |
| 5 |
|
11-3 | 6-3 | |
| 6 |
|
10-4 | 8-2 | |
| 7 |
|
9-4-1 | 7-2-1 | |
| 8 |
|
8-6 | 5-5 | |
| 9 |
|
7-7 | 5-4 | |
| 10 |
|
6-7-1 | 3-6-1 | |
| 11 |
|
6-8 | 4-5 | |
| 12 |
|
5-9 | 4-5 | |
| 13 |
|
4-10 | 4-7 | NO wins the tiebreak over WAS on Conference Record (4-7 vs 2-7). |
| 14 |
|
4-10 | 2-7 | |
| 15 |
|
3-11 | 3-7 | |
| 16 |
|
2-12 | 1-9 | |
|
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
| 1 |
|
12-2 | 7-2 | |
| 2 |
|
11-3 | 6-3 | |
| 3 |
|
10-4 | 7-2 | |
| 4 |
|
8-6 | 7-3 | |
| 5 |
|
10-4 | 8-2 | LAC wins the tiebreak over BUF on Conference Record (8-2 vs 7-3). |
| 6 |
|
10-4 | 7-3 | |
| 7 |
|
9-5 | 7-2 | |
| 8 |
|
8-6 | 6-4 | |
| 9 |
|
7-7 | 5-5 | |
| 10 |
|
6-8 | 3-6 | KC wins the tiebreak over MIA on Conference Record (3-6 vs 3-7). |
| 11 |
|
6-8 | 3-7 | |
| 12 |
|
4-10 | 4-6 | |
| 13 |
|
3-11 | 2-8 | NYJ wins the tiebreak over CLE on Head-to-Head. |
| 14 |
|
3-11 | 2-7 | |
| 15 |
|
2-12 | 2-8 | LV wins the tiebreak over TEN on Head-to-Head. |
| 16 |
|
2-12 | 1-9 |
| NFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
9-5 | 2-2 | |
| 2 |
|
6-7-1 | 3-1 | |
| 3 |
|
4-10 | 2-1 | |
| 4 |
|
2-12 | 1-4 | |
| NFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
10-4 | 1-3 | |
| 2 |
|
9-4-1 | 4-0 | |
| 3 |
|
8-6 | 1-3 | |
| 4 |
|
6-8 | 2-2 | |
| NFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
7-7 | 2-2 | TB wins the tiebreak over CAR on Common Games (5-5 vs 4-6). |
| 2 |
|
7-7 | 2-2 | |
| 3 |
|
5-9 | 2-3 | |
| 4 |
|
4-10 | 3-2 | |
| NFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
11-3 | 3-1 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
| 2 |
|
11-3 | 2-2 | |
| 3 |
|
10-4 | 4-1 | |
| 4 |
|
3-11 | 0-5 | |
| AFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
11-3 | 3-1 | |
| 2 |
|
10-4 | 3-2 | |
| 3 |
|
6-8 | 3-2 | |
| 4 |
|
3-11 | 0-4 | |
| AFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
8-6 | 3-1 | |
| 2 |
|
7-7 | 3-2 | |
| 3 |
|
4-10 | 3-2 | |
| 4 |
|
3-11 | 0-4 | |
| AFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
10-4 | 3-1 | |
| 2 |
|
9-5 | 4-1 | |
| 3 |
|
8-6 | 2-2 | |
| 4 |
|
2-12 | 0-5 | |
| AFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
12-2 | 3-1 | |
| 2 |
|
10-4 | 5-0 | |
| 3 |
|
6-8 | 1-3 | |
| 4 |
|
2-12 | 0-5 |
x Team has clinched a playoff berth.
e Team has been eliminated from playoff contention.
NFC Teams knocked out of 1 seed contention: NYG, ARI, WAS, NO, ATL, MIN, DAL, CAR, DET, TB
AFC Teams knocked out of 1 seed contention: TEN, LV, CLE, NYJ, CIN, MIA, KC, BAL, IND, PIT
Clinching Scenarios Entering Week 16
NFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
AFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 16
NFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
AFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 16
We often say we’re in the business of possibilities, not probabilities. Because of that, in our simulations, we consider each team equally likely to win. However, we do make the odds of a tie only 1% in order to increase variance and cover more of the possibility space in limited simulations.
The table below is from 1 millions simulations using 49.5% home win, 49.5% away win, and 1% tie odds. This is not a prediction. It is an estimate of the percentage of possible scenarios that results in this seed (under our 1% tie criteria).
If an entry is blank, the team cannot get that seed. It’s also worth noting that due to rounding, the numbers for a team may not add up to exactly 100%.
NFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home and away teams both 49.5% to win each game and 1% chance of a tie game
| 1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41% | 8% | 1% | 31% | 14% | 4% | ||
|
|
13% | 44% | 2% | 4% | 9% | 16% | 11% | |
|
|
1% | 8% | 80% | 10% | <1% | 2% | ||
|
|
2% | 59% | 39% | |||||
|
|
30% | 3% | <1% | 34% | 27% | 6% | <1% | |
|
|
13% | 3% | <1% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 1% | |
|
|
2% | 31% | 4% | 2% | 14% | 38% | 9% | |
|
|
2% | 2% | 2% | 17% | 78% | |||
|
|
9% | 31% | 61% | |||||
|
|
1% | <1% | 98% | |||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% |
AFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home and away teams both 49.5% to win each game and 1% chance of a tie game
| 1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
71% | 11% | 3% | 12% | 3% | <1% | ||
|
|
9% | 45% | 17% | <1% | 10% | 14% | 4% | <1% |
|
|
9% | 18% | 32% | 2% | 8% | 13% | 13% | 6% |
|
|
<1% | 4% | 62% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 33% | |
|
|
8% | 5% | 3% | 45% | 20% | 15% | 6% | |
|
|
3% | 15% | 11% | <1% | 18% | 31% | 20% | 3% |
|
|
<1% | 5% | 25% | 1% | 7% | 15% | 32% | 14% |
|
|
<1% | 6% | 1% | 1% | 4% | 15% | 72% | |
|
|
34% | <1% | 66% | |||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% |
Seed Control Entering Week 16
The seed that a team controls is the worst seed that team could get if they win out. These are often mutually exclusive because it is impossible for teams that play each other in future weeks to both win out. If a team changed controlled seed from last week, last week’s seed is noted in parentheses.
Teams that control the 1 seed:
LAR
SEA
DEN
Teams that control the 2 seed:
GB
CHI
NE
Teams that control the 3 seed:
PHI
JAX
Teams that control the 4 seed:
TB
CAR
PIT
BAL
Teams that control the 5 seed:
SF
LAC
Teams that control the 6 seed:
BUF
Teams that control the 7 seed:
HOU
Teams that could win out and still miss the playoffs:
DAL
DET(7)
IND(7)
Teams that are already eliminated from playoff contention:
NYG
ARI
WAS
NO
ATL
MIN
TEN
LV
CLE
NYJ
CIN
MIA
KC
Please consider supporting us!
We have a Patreon to allow you to donate to cover our costs, which in turn allows us to never put ads on the site again. Any donation is greatly appreciated, both by us and all visitors to the site! If you are unable to or do not wish to donate, that’s totally fine, too. You can help the site by sharing it on social media, and even if you don’t want to do that, just coming to the site helps us out, too!