Playoff Picture Entering Week 15 2025
All scenarios should be complete now.
Standings Entering Week 15
|
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
| 1 |
|
10-3 | 5-3 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
| 2 |
|
9-3-1 | 7-2-1 | |
| 3 |
|
8-5 | 7-3 | |
| 4 |
|
7-6 | 5-4 | TB wins the tiebreak over CAR on Common Games (5-4 vs 4-5). |
| 5 |
|
10-3 | 6-3 | |
| 6 |
|
9-4 | 8-2 | SF wins the tiebreak over CHI on Conference Record (8-2 vs 6-3). |
| 7 |
|
9-4 | 6-3 | |
| 8 |
|
8-5 | 5-4 | |
| 9 |
|
7-6 | 5-3 | |
| 10 |
|
6-6-1 | 3-5-1 | |
| 11 |
|
5-8 | 3-5 | |
| 12 |
|
4-9 | 3-5 | |
| 13 |
|
3-10 | 3-7 | WAS drops out of the tiebreak with NO/ARI on Conference Record (1-7 vs 3-7). ARI wins the tiebreak over NO on Head-to-Head. |
| 14 |
|
3-10 | 3-7 | NO wins the tiebreak over WAS on Conference Record (3-7 vs 1-7). |
| 15 |
|
3-10 | 1-7 | |
| 16 |
|
2-11 | 1-8 | |
|
|
Record | Conf. Rec. | Explanation | |
| 1 |
|
11-2 | 7-2 | DEN wins the tiebreak over NE on Conference Record (7-2 vs 6-2). |
| 2 |
|
11-2 | 6-2 | |
| 3 |
|
9-4 | 6-2 | |
| 4 |
|
7-6 | 6-3 | |
| 5 |
|
9-4 | 7-2 | LAC wins the tiebreak over BUF on Conference Record (7-2 vs 6-3). |
| 6 |
|
9-4 | 6-3 | |
| 7 |
|
8-5 | 7-2 | HOU wins the tiebreak over IND on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
| 8 |
|
8-5 | 6-4 | |
| 9 |
|
6-7 | 4-5 | BAL wins the tiebreak over KC/MIA on Conference Record (4-5 vs 3-5/3-6). |
| 10 |
|
6-7 | 3-5 | KC wins the tiebreak over MIA on Conference Record (3-5 vs 3-6). |
| 11 |
|
6-7 | 3-6 | |
| 12 |
|
4-9 | 4-5 | |
| 13 |
|
3-10 | 2-7 | NYJ wins the tiebreak over CLE on Head-to-Head. |
| 14 |
|
3-10 | 2-7 | |
| 15 |
|
2-11 | 2-8 | LV wins the tiebreak over TEN on Head-to-Head. |
| 16 |
|
2-11 | 1-9 |
| NFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
8-5 | 2-2 | |
| 2 |
|
6-6-1 | 3-1 | |
| 3 |
|
3-10 | 1-1 | |
| 4 |
|
2-11 | 1-3 | |
| NFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
9-3-1 | 4-0 | |
| 2 |
|
9-4 | 1-3 | |
| 3 |
|
8-5 | 1-3 | |
| 4 |
|
5-8 | 2-2 | |
| NFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
7-6 | 2-1 | TB wins the tiebreak over CAR on Common Games (5-4 vs 4-5). |
| 2 |
|
7-6 | 2-1 | |
| 3 |
|
4-9 | 1-3 | |
| 4 |
|
3-10 | 2-2 | |
| NFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
10-3 | 3-1 | LAR wins the tiebreak over SEA on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
| 2 |
|
10-3 | 2-2 | |
| 3 |
|
9-4 | 4-1 | |
| 4 |
|
3-10 | 0-5 | |
| AFC | East | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
11-2 | 3-0 | |
| 2 |
|
9-4 | 2-2 | |
| 3 |
|
6-7 | 3-2 | |
| 4 |
|
3-10 | 0-4 | |
| AFC | North | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
7-6 | 3-1 | |
| 2 |
|
6-7 | 2-2 | |
| 3 |
|
4-9 | 3-1 | |
| 4 |
|
3-10 | 0-4 | |
| AFC | South | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
9-4 | 3-1 | |
| 2 |
|
8-5 | 4-1 | HOU wins the tiebreak over IND on Head-to-Head (1-0). |
| 3 |
|
8-5 | 2-2 | |
| 4 |
|
2-11 | 0-5 | |
| AFC | West | Record | Div. Rec. | Explanation |
| 1 |
|
11-2 | 3-1 | |
| 2 |
|
9-4 | 4-0 | |
| 3 |
|
6-7 | 1-2 | |
| 4 |
|
2-11 | 0-5 |
e Team has been eliminated from playoff contention.
k Team has been knocked out of division title contention.
NFC Teams knocked out of 1 seed contention: NYG, WAS, NO, ARI, ATL, MIN, DAL
AFC Teams knocked out of 1 seed contention: TEN, LV, CLE, NYJ, CIN, MIA, KC, BAL
Clinching Scenarios Entering Week 15
NFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
AFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
Elimination Scenarios Entering Week 15
NFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
| OR | 8) |
|
| OR | 9) |
|
| OR | 10) |
|
| OR | 11) |
|
| OR | 12) |
|
| OR | 13) |
|
| OR | 14) |
|
| OR | 15) |
|
| OR | 16) |
|
| OR | 17) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
| OR | 8) |
|
| OR | 9) |
|
| OR | 10) |
|
| OR | 11) |
|
| OR | 12) |
|
AFC
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
| OR | 6) |
|
| OR | 7) |
|
| OR | 8) |
|
| OR | 9) |
|
| OR | 10) |
|
| OR | 11) |
|
| OR | 12) |
|
| OR | 13) |
|
| OR | 14) |
|
| OR | 15) |
|
| OR | 16) |
|
| OR | 17) |
|
| OR | 18) |
|
| OR | 19) |
|
| OR | 20) |
|
| OR | 21) |
|
| OR | 22) |
|
| OR | 23) |
|
| OR | 24) |
|
| OR | 25) |
|
| OR | 26) |
|
| OR | 27) |
|
| OR | 28) |
|
| OR | 29) |
|
| OR | 30) |
|
| OR | 31) |
|
| OR | 32) |
|
| OR | 33) |
|
| OR | 34) |
|
| OR | 35) |
|
| OR | 36) |
|
| OR | 37) |
|
| OR | 38) |
|
| OR | 39) |
|
| OR | 40) |
|
| OR | 41) |
|
| OR | 42) |
|
The italicized portions in these scenarios are results that are solely for Strength of Victory purposes.
Scenarios 5-6, 8-9, 11, 15-16, & 37-41 are for JAX clinching Strength of Victory over KC.
Scenarios 7, 12-14, & 20-24 are for JAX clinching a tie in Strength of Victory with KC while BAL cannot reach that same Strength of Victory.
Scenarios 10 & 17-19 are for JAX clinching a tie in Strength of Victory with KC while MIA cannot reach that same Strength of Victory.
Scenarios 26-33 are for a guarantee that at least one of JAX or BAL will end up with a better Strength of Victory (Though neither individually has it clinched).
Scenario 42 is for a guarantee that at least one of JAX or BUF will end up with a better Strength of Victory (Though neither individually has it clinched).
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
|
|
| 1) |
|
|
| OR | 2) |
|
| OR | 3) |
|
| OR | 4) |
|
| OR | 5) |
|
Possible and Simulated Seeds Entering Week 15
We often say we’re in the business of possibilities, not probabilities. Because of that, in our simulations, we consider each team equally likely to win. However, we do make the odds of a tie only 1% in order to increase variance and cover more of the possibility space in limited simulations.
The table below is from 1 millions simulations using 49.5% home win, 49.5% away win, and 1% tie odds. This is not a prediction. It is an estimate of the percentage of possible scenarios that results in this seed (under our 1% tie criteria).
If an entry is blank, the team cannot get that seed. It’s also worth noting that due to rounding, the numbers for a team may not add up to exactly 100%.
NFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home and away teams both 49.5% to win each game and 1% chance of a tie game
| 1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
33% | 15% | 1% | <1% | 23% | 14% | 9% | 6% |
|
|
16% | 39% | 3% | <1% | 7% | 13% | 15% | 7% |
|
|
1% | 6% | 56% | 22% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 14% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | 13% | 42% | <1% | 44% | ||
|
|
27% | 7% | <1% | <1% | 28% | 21% | 12% | 5% |
|
|
11% | 6% | <1% | <1% | 25% | 25% | 22% | 11% |
|
|
11% | 20% | 1% | <1% | 11% | 15% | 18% | 22% |
|
|
2% | 6% | 2% | <1% | 6% | 11% | 21% | 53% |
|
|
<1% | 1% | 17% | 27% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 54% |
|
|
<1% | 7% | 8% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 84% | |
|
|
<1% | >99% | ||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% |
AFC
Results from 1 million simulations with home and away teams both 49.5% to win each game and 1% chance of a tie game
| 1 seed | 2 seed | 3 seed | 4 seed | 5 seed | 6 seed | 7 seed | Miss Playoffs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
52% | 24% | 6% | <1% | 12% | 4% | 1% | <1% |
|
|
33% | 44% | 8% | <1% | 8% | 5% | 1% | <1% |
|
|
5% | 13% | 37% | 3% | 7% | 12% | 15% | 9% |
|
|
<1% | <1% | 4% | 65% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 30% |
|
|
5% | 7% | 5% | <1% | 36% | 20% | 14% | 14% |
|
|
3% | 8% | 3% | <1% | 24% | 31% | 19% | 11% |
|
|
<1% | 2% | 22% | 1% | 8% | 15% | 24% | 28% |
|
|
<1% | 2% | 14% | 1% | 5% | 12% | 22% | 44% |
|
|
<1% | 29% | <1% | <1% | <1% | 71% | ||
|
|
<1% | 1% | 3% | 97% | ||||
|
|
<1% | <1% | 2% | 98% | ||||
|
|
2% | 98% | ||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% | |||||||
|
|
100% |
Seed Control Entering Week 15
The seed that a team controls is the worst seed that team could get if they win out. These are often mutually exclusive because it is impossible for teams that play each other in future weeks to both win out. If a team changed controlled seed from last week, last week’s seed is noted in parentheses.
Teams that control the 1 seed:
LAR(2)
SEA(2)
DEN
Teams that control the 2 seed:
GB
CHI(1)
NE
Teams that control the 3 seed:
PHI
JAX
Teams that control the 4 seed:
TB
CAR
PIT
BAL
Teams that control the 5 seed:
SF
LAC
Teams that control the 6 seed:
BUF
Teams that control the 7 seed:
DET(E)
HOU
IND(3)
Teams that could win out and still miss the playoffs:
DAL
MIN
MIA
CIN
KC
Teams that are already eliminated from playoff contention:
NYG
WAS
NO
ARI
ATL
TEN
LV
CLE
NYJ
Please consider supporting us!
We have a Patreon to allow you to donate to cover our costs, which in turn allows us to never put ads on the site again. Any donation is greatly appreciated, both by us and all visitors to the site! If you are unable to or do not wish to donate, that’s totally fine, too. You can help the site by sharing it on social media, and even if you don’t want to do that, just coming to the site helps us out, too!